Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers - Design Guidelines, HDPE, PET, PVC Polypropylene Contact APR | Guidelines
APR Home, press releases, opinions, notes to visitors, archives
guidelines, tools, pet, pvc, polypropylene, hdpe
APR members, affiliates, etc.
About APR, Champions for Change, Awards
Contact the Association of Post Consuerm Plastic Recyclers
 
 

DESIGN GUIDELINES:
Polypropylene Bottles
Home > Guidelines > Design Guidelines > Polypropylene Bottles

WITHIN THIS SECTION
Guidelines (Purpose/Overview)
Guidelines At-A-Glance
Sorting & Reclamation
Density Range
Labels & Protocols
Other Tools
 
 
polypropylene Bottles
Closures/Closure Liners | Sleeves/Safety Seals | Colors | Labels/Adhesives | Inks/Adhesives | Direct Printing/Decoration | Layer/Coatings | Other Attachments | Post-Consumer Content

The basic design for recyclability guideline to consider when making material choices for any attachment to the bottle is to consider their general compatibility with the base resin (PP) or their removal efficiency in conventional water-based separation systems that separate plastics by density. These attachments may include closures, closure liners, base cups, inserts, labels, pour spouts, handles, sleeves, safety seals, coatings and layers. PP has a density less than 1.0 and will float in these systems. For efficient separation and removal in conventional sink/float separation systems, attachments should be made from materials with a density greater than 1.0 or be otherwise compatible with PP in the reclamation process. Materials with a density greater than 1.0 will sink in these systems and can be easily separated from the PP. (Density range of key plastic materials.) It should be noted that the use of PVC attachments is undesirable in conventional recycling systems and should be avoided.

Closures/Closure Liners back to top
Plastic closures made from HDPE, LDPE or PP are preferred to all others. Closure systems that contain no liners and leave no residual rings or attachments when removed from the bottle are also preferred. The use of closures that are unpigmented or the same color as the bottle is desirable. The use of PVC for closures or closure liners is undesirable and should be avoided. The use of metal closures is undesirable and should be avoided as they are more difficult and more costly to remove in conventional reclamation systems compared to preferred closure systems (HDPE, LDPE or PP).

 

Sleeves/Safety Seals back to top
If tamper-resistance is required in specific product applications, it should be an integral design feature of the bottle. The use of tamper-resistant or tamper-evident sleeves or seals is discouraged as they can act as contaminants if they do not completely detach from the bottle, or are not easily removed in conventional separation systems. If sleeves or safety seals are used, they should be designed to completely detach from the bottle. Shrink sleeves are preferred when sleeves are necessary. The use of PVC sleeves or safety seals is undesirable and should be avoided.

 

Colors back to top
Unpigmented PP bottles have the highest value and the widest variety of end-use applications. Therefore, the use of unpigmented PP bottles is preferred to pigmented bottles.

 

LABELS/ADHESIVES back to top
PP, OPP, HDPE, MDPE, LDPE, LLDPE, or PS label stock is preferred to all other label materials. Metallized labels increase contamination and separation costs and should be avoided. The use of PVC labels is undesirable and should be avoided.

 

iNKS/ADHESIVES back to top
Inks must be chosen that do not bleed color when agitated in hot water as they can discolor the PP regrind during the reclamation process diminishing or eliminating its value for recycling. The use of inks that bleed should be scrupulously avoided. (The APR has developed a testing protocol to assist label manufacturers in evaluating whether a label ink will bleed in conventional PP reclamation systems.) Label adhesives should be water-soluble or dispersible at temperatures between 140°F and 180°F in order to be removed in conventional washing and separation systems. If adhesives are not removed efficiently, they may disperse on the PP regrind and embed unwanted contaminants. The use of other adhesive types is discouraged and should be avoided. (The APR has developed a testing protocol for adhesive manufacturers to evaluate the impact of adhesive products in conventional reclamation systems.) Adhesive usage and surface area covered should be minimized to the greatest extent possible to maximize PP yield and avoid contamination.

 

direct printing/decoration back to top
Presently, all direct printing other than date coding, either for product labeling or decoration, contaminates recycled PP in conventional reclamation systems. The inks used in direct printing may bleed ink or otherwise discolor the PP during processing, or introduce incompatible contaminants. In either case, the value of the PP for recycling is diminished or eliminated.

 

layers/coatings back to top
Some PP bottle designs require the use of layers for specific product applications. The use of non-PP layers is undesirable and should be avoided, unless they are compatible with or easily separable from PP in conventional recycling systems. Current PP recycling systems can tolerate the use of EVOH layers. If layers must be used, their content should be minimized to the greatest extent possible to maximize PP yield and reduce potential contamination and separation costs. (The APR’s Champions for Change Cooperative Testing Program invites consumer product manufacturers and plastic bottle and bottle component manufacturers to work with APR member companies to determine whether new modifications to a regularly recycled plastic bottle will impact conventional recycling systems prior to introducing the modification.)

 

other attachments back to top
The use of other attachments is discouraged, as they reduce base resin yield and increase separation costs. Other attachments may include handles, inserts and pour spouts, in addition to others that might be developed. If attachments are added to a bottle, they should be made from 1) materials with a density greater than 1.0 — with the exception of PVC, which is undesirable and should be avoided — that will easily separate from PP in conventional separation systems, or 2) compatible materials such as HDPE, LDPE or preferably unpigmented PP. The use of HDPE or LDPE attachments, if necessary, should be limited to less than 5 percent of the total bottle weight. Higher percentages can contaminate the PP for many recycling applications, as these materials are difficult to separate from PP in conventional systems. If pour spouts are added to a bottle they should be designed to leave no product residue and allow for complete removal of product contents when the bottle is empty. If adhesives are used to affix attachments, they should be water-soluble or dispersible at temperatures between 140oF and 180oF in order to be removed in conventional washing and separation systems. If adhesives are not removed efficiently, they may disperse on the PP regrind and embed unwanted contaminants. The use of other adhesive types is discouraged and should be avoided. (The APR has developed a testing protocol for adhesive manufacturers to evaluate the impact of adhesive products in conventional reclamation systems.) Adhesive usage and surface area covered should be minimized to the greatest extent possible to maximize PP yield and avoid contamination.

 

 

post-consumer content back to top
The use of post-consumer HDPE in bottles is encouraged, whenever possible.
 
 

1300 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22209 · 703- 741-5578 · 703-741-5646 (fax)
robin_cotchan@plastics.org · http://www.3cstudios.com